[bop-devel] 2.x or 3.x?

[Erik Harrison]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Ivan Kohler <ivan at freeside.biz> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:52:52PM -0400, Erik Harrison wrote:
>> Hello all.
>>
>> First off, the BOP framework is very nice - gave me an excuse to go
>> back to Perl after years of PHP work. I was wondering though if the
>> 3.x version is still considered unstable or if in the months of
>> silence it has in fact solidified in the background.
>
> I don't think it was ever *unstable* as such, its more a matter of
> specifying what we're going to deprecate and what we're going to ask
> module authors to start supporting in the new version.
>
> I certainly would recommend v3 for current use or module development.
>
> Maybe if we can get some sort of introspection going soon, so modules
> can declare what features they support, we can stop worrying so much
> about delaying an official v3 and do things more incrementally.

Sounds nice. I assume patches that added this stuff  to the core would
be accepted?

>
>> Either way, baring a major change of plans I'll be implementing a new
>> backend module. What's the standard for getting it listed and made
>> available? Just submit it to CPAN?
>
> Yup.  You could also email me or post something here if you'd like it
> listed on http://420.am/business-onlinepayment/ immediately (I scan CPAN
> for new modules a few times a year, but not terribly often).

I'll do it. I've never submitted anything to CPAN before. I almost
feel like a real boy.

>
> --
> _ivan
> _______________________________________________
> bop-devel mailing list
> bop-devel at 420.am
> http://420.am/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bop-devel
>