[bop-devel] 2.x or 3.x?

[Ivan Kohler]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:35:43PM -0400, Erik Harrison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Ivan Kohler <ivan at freeside.biz> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:52:52PM -0400, Erik Harrison wrote:
> >> Hello all.
> >>
> >> First off, the BOP framework is very nice - gave me an excuse to go
> >> back to Perl after years of PHP work. I was wondering though if the
> >> 3.x version is still considered unstable or if in the months of
> >> silence it has in fact solidified in the background.
> >
> > I don't think it was ever *unstable* as such, its more a matter of
> > specifying what we're going to deprecate and what we're going to ask
> > module authors to start supporting in the new version.
> >
> > I certainly would recommend v3 for current use or module development.
> >
> > Maybe if we can get some sort of introspection going soon, so modules
> > can declare what features they support, we can stop worrying so much
> > about delaying an official v3 and do things more incrementally.
> 
> Sounds nice. I assume patches that added this stuff  to the core would
> be accepted?

Sure.

-- 
_ivan