[freeside-devel] RE: [freeside] Freeside draft checks scheme changes
ivan
ivan at 420.am
Tue Nov 6 09:06:40 PST 2001
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:45:36AM -0600, Jeff Foster wrote:
>
> From: ivan [mailto:ivan at 420.am]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:37 AM
>
> > Use the `payinfo' field for the routing number and account number, or
> > convince me why that's not appropriate.
>
> Thought of that and started that way first. I would join the
> routing number and account number with a ':' separater. But I
> didn't want to make too much work for myself and thought that
> just adding the new fields would be easier.
Schema changes are a pain and I probably tend toward minimizing them when
possible. I don't think I'm convinced that it's any significant extra
work to just put them in the payinfo field; it's not called "cardnumber"
for a reason.
> > I could maybe see adding the `checknum' field. Tell me more about how
> > it's supposed to work; does the customer give you a check number in some
> > starting range and you incremement it by one each time or what?
>
> Yes that is correct. When the billing is done the current check
> number is sent to the billing program, the value is incremented,
> and the cust_main entry is updated.
Okay. How about an integer instead of a varchar?
--
_ivan
More information about the freeside-devel
mailing list