[freeside] initial config saves some of the values?

[Randall Lucas]

It appears as though mod_perl 2 (version 1.99 is simply the pre-release  
of 2, and is NOT just a higher 1) is causing various problems for  
different folks; see e.g.  
http://www.sisd.com/freeside/list-archive/msg03312.html  and  
http://www.sisd.com/freeside/list-archive/msg03360.html for  
pronouncements from Ivan on the topic).

Per the above I would consider only apache 1 and mod_perl 1 to be  
properly "supported."

Randall

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 01:10 AM, Tony Carter wrote:

> According to this
> http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/help/ 
> help.html#Wrong_Apache_mod_perl_co
> mbination Apache 2.x is not compatible with mod_perl 1.
>
> What is everyone else on the list using?
>
> Ivan, can you please publish a "supported versions" matrix of some  
> sort?
>
> -Tony
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randall Lucas [mailto:rlucas at tercent.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:56 AM
> To: Tony Carter
> Cc: ivan-freeside at sisd.com
> Subject: Re: [freeside] initial config saves some of the values?
>
>
> Hmm, is it too early to call this a trend?  Damn Red Hat for shipping
> with that glorified beta software.
>
> I am testing a second installation with Apache / mod_perl 1 and haven't
> experienced this problem (although httpd will crash before even logging
> or segfaulting if I try to PerlRequire either Apache::ASP or
> HTML::Mason -- however, it seems to work fine without PerlRequire'ing
> ASP at startup).
>
> Best,
>
> Randall
>
> On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 12:51 AM, Tony Carter wrote:
>
>>> *The major note to this is I am using mod_perl 1.99 / Apache 2 on  
>>> this
>>> testing box.
>>
>>> Of the others who've had conf script troubles, what is your os/fs
>>> version/apache version/mod_perl version?  Can you check to see what's
>>> coming through on the request?
>>
>>> Best,
>>
>>> Randall
>>
>> Randall,
>> I'm using Redhat 9.0, ext3 fs, Apache 2.40 with mod_perl-1.99_07.
>>
>> -Tony
>>
>