setuid

[Ivan Kohler]

On Mon, Dec 14, 1998 at 12:23:28AM -0700, Jay wrote:
> 
> Just for kicks -- here is what /var/lib/httpd/log/error-log is reporting:
> 
> YOU HAVEN'T DISABLED SET-ID SCRIPTS IN THE KERNEL YET!
> FIX YOUR KERNEL, PUT A C WRAPPER AROUND THIS SCRIPT, OR USE -u AND UNDUMP!

I haven't seen this message since SunOS 4.  Maybe you should try chmod
4755 (not 4711) for suidperl? 

> I am tried changing cust_main.cgi to run 'suidperl' instead of 'perl -Tw',

Don't do this.

> I have tried the C wrapper (suggested in the perlsec man page), all of
> which owned by the user 'freeside' and chmod'd 4755. I also even tried the

`wrapsuid' from the Perl distribution is a bit more robust.

> C wrapper calling the Perl script set to run 'suidperl' -- still producing
> the same results.
> 
> ~Jay
> 
> On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Jay wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hmmm...it would seem that my version of /usr/bin/suidperl is already 4711
> > to root. Here's what I have:
> > 
> > (root at energy.kinetic.org) 00:02:11
> > [/var/spool]: l /usr/bin/suidperl
> > lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root           15 Nov  6 21:12 /usr/bin/suidperl
> > -> suidperl5.00404*
> > 
> > (root at energy.kinetic.org) 00:02:16
> > [/var/spool]: l /usr/bin/suidperl5.00404
> > -rws--x--x   1 root     bin      463936 Mar 23  1998 /usr/bin/suidperl5.00404*
> > 
> > Any other ideas? I am starting to get desperate here. :)
> > 
> > ~Jay
> > 
> > On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Christian Eva wrote:
> > 
> > > Jay wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Well, some progress. I found a binary called 'suidperl' -- however, there
> > > > is no man page for it, and I cannot find any information about how to use
> > > > it. Any pointers?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Well I had a similar problem because in my Suse 5.3 the suidperl did not have suid
> > > root(under the SuSE installation option secure). When perl has the setuid bit set
> > > on its scripts it
> > > automatically executes suidperl. After changing suidperl to "4755 owner root" the
> > > CGI's worked fine.
> > > 
> > > Christian
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > ~Jay
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > My distro did include Perl5.
> > > > >
> > > > > It probably includes Perl suid emulation in a separate package than the
> > > > > normal Perl package.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I checked out the perlsec manpage, but that
> > > > > > recommended that I should rename all of the CGI scripts and then create
> > > > > > small C wrappers (with the original script name) to be setuid to call the
> > > > > > newly named CGI. While I am sure that is a possible (but pain in the neck)
> > > > > > solution, there has to be an easier/better way. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > The better way is Perl's setuid emulation, also mentioned in the perlsec
> > > > > manpage.  If your distribution does not include this option (I'd be _very_
> > > > > surprised if Slackware didn't), then you will need to recompile Perl.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I did try the perlsec
> > > > > > method on the cust_main.cgi script, however when I executed the new C code
> > > > > > that calls the original CGI script, it complains that setuid is still
> > > > > > allowed in my kernel. Unfortunately, I am not enough of a coder to get
> > > > > > into the kernel source and try to track that down.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This brings me to a couple of questions: #1) how to I disable the setuid
> > > > > > stuff in the kernel so that the perlsec method will work?
> > > > >
> > > > > Linux 2.0.x ignores the setuid bit on scripts, which is fine.  Perl
> > > > > provides setuid emulation.  You don't need to change anything in your
> > > > > kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > > #2) will I need
> > > > > > to create a C wrapper for _every_ setuid CGI script in the FreeSide
> > > > > > package?
> > > > >
> > > > > That's one possible solution, yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Finally, #3) where can I get information about that perl-suid
> > > > > > package?
> > > > >
> > > > > That's the name for a Debian package.  Check your distributions's
> > > > > documentation for the equivalent.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you sure?  *scripts*, not ELF executables?  What language?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hmmm...good point. I just tested it with a quick bash shell script. It did
> > > > > > not work. The script was setuid to user 'jay' but when I executed it (as
> > > > > > user 'root') it ran as 'root'. Thus, it would seem that all of my other
> > > > > > setuid stuff are ELF binaries.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, now that I know my kernel will not support suid scripts, and I do not
> > > > > > have the perl-suid pagkage, and the perlsec method (making C wrappers for
> > > > > > every suid CGI) doesn't work because of something still enabled in my
> > > > > > kernel -- any ideas? :) Thanks for the help.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ivan Kohler <ivan at sisd.com> - finger for PGP key - <moc.dsis at navi> relhoK navI
> > > > > Open-source billing and administration for ISPs - http://www.sisd.com/freeside
> > > > > 20 4,16 * * * saytime # please don't be surprised if you find me dreaming too
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > - J a y   J a c o b s o n
> > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > > > - jay at kinetic.org   www.kinetic.org
> > > >
> > > > Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Christian J Knoepfel Eva
> > > Phoenix Integration
> > > Rosebank Business Park
> > > 333 Crumlin Road, Belfast, BT14 7EA, Northern Ireland, U.K.
> > > Phone +44-1232-550300
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > - J a y   J a c o b s o n
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > - jay at kinetic.org   www.kinetic.org
> > 
> > Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of.
> > 
> 
> - J a y   J a c o b s o n
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - jay at kinetic.org   www.kinetic.org
> 
> Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of.
> 

-- 
Ivan Kohler <ivan at sisd.com> - finger for PGP key - <moc.dsis at navi> relhoK navI
Open-source billing and administration for ISPs - http://www.sisd.com/freeside
20 4,16 * * * saytime # please don't be surprised if you find me dreaming too