[freeside-devel] svc_broadband refactor

[Jason Hall]

On Wednesday 21 February 2007 22:24, Jeff Finucane wrote:
> freeside-devel:
>
>   Should address information be stored in svc_broadband or is it time for
> FS::address?
>
>   The proposal at present calls for speed_down_mir, _cir, and corresponding
> speed_up_*.  What of 802.1D/802.1P without 802.1q (or similar possibilities
> stated at layer3)?  In particular, Motorola Canopy SMs allow for setting
> MIR and CIR separately for 'priority' and 'standard' traffic.  A list
> could provide the reservation information for each of the priorities
> any particular device allows.

FS:: Address, not just for the svc_broadband refactoring, but just to 
normalize the information in cust_main, having billing, and shipping as child 
entities would be nice.

--
Jayce^